I find it hard to understand the insurance company's risk assesment process, we've been looking around for various quotes for a Disco 2 Td5 and a VW Polo 1.4 CL, I've been quoted around the ?600-800 mark for the Disco, and ?150 for the Polo.
So what we've worked out is that it's cheaper for the Mrs to insure the Disco with me as a named driver and me to insure the Polo with her as a named driver. So we're paying ?350 fully comp on the Disco and ?152 fully comp on the wee Polo.
But what I don't understand is the variation on price quotes, I was on 2 price comparison sites and there was a ?30 difference between quotes for the Polo from the SAME company! And on another site I put in 3rd party fire + theft just to see what difference it would make, it turned out to be MORE expensive!!!!
A cynical man might think that the insurance companies are just plucking random figures out of thin air, and a really cynical man might think that as insurance is becoming so expensive, a lot of poor sods are being fleeced buying 3rd party f+t thinking that it's actually cheaper than fully comp......just a though.....